跳到正文
原文
natolambert· @natolambert · X·· 7 小时前AI 评分56

Nathan Lambert 评中国 LLM 数据经济与美国的对比

AI 导读

Nathan Lambert 称赞一篇关于中国 LLM 数据经济及其与美国对比的文章,文中总结 Mercor、Surge 和 Handshake 拥有最大网络和供给,同时许多公司提供 RL-ready environments 等专业化服务。

正文 · 原文

This is the best piece I’ve read to date on the Chinese data economy for LLMs, and how it compares to the US counterparts (summarized by Mercor, Surge, and Handshake having the biggest network, SUPPLY, but also many companies with specialized services, in the form of RL-ready environments). China’s leading spenders, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance, don’t mirror OpenAI and Anthropic leading the US market.

The Chinese market likely has a bias similar to their “ownership” mentality of more LLM builders in house, like Meituan, RedNote, and Xiaomi, whereas major US tech services build more on APIs and existing open-weight models.

Altogether, it seems like Chinese labs were 6–12 months behind on willingness to spend on data, relative to the US, but are rapidly catching up.

I've been hearing lots of murmurings on China's AI industry, but folks are secretive, so it's hard to put this all together.

来源:natolambert · x.com