Muse Wonder 被指 token 消耗大、成本高且速度慢于 Astra
作者实测发现 Muse Wonder 使用成本很高,在 Low Effort 档不到 12 小时就用尽 Muse Code 周限额,跑 VulcanBench 时连一整个 effort level 都无法完成。
Out of the gate, I am finding Muse Wonder to be a very expensive model to use.
At Low Effort, I hit my weekly usage limit on my Muse Code plan in less than 12 hours.
With VulcanBench, I couldn't get through an entire effort level run without hitting my limits.
Compare this to even something like Astra, which did every effort level, in under 12 hours, for less than $50.
That makes Muse Wonder more expensive, and a lot slower, than Astra.
Now I'm not sure what to do. I'll either needs to pay a small fortune to benchmark this model given how token hungry it is, or take a month or longer benchmarking it.
Put together some preliminary results comparing Muse Wonder to Opus 5.5 and GPT 6.1 Sol w/respect to token use.
While it's looking like an accurate model, I care a lot about cost-per-task, as we all should, and right now, this number is looking very high.
来源:morganlinton · x.com