作者认为无需提示、自主担责的智能体是未来重要产品线
作者认为当前所有智能体都假设有人负责并提示,未来最有潜力的产品线之一是让智能体像员工一样对某项工作(如会计、邮件营销)负全责。他指出现在智能体不承担责任,导致用户需操心的事务反而增多,且指望大众学会使用智能体并不现实。
I know nobody cared about this at OpenAI dev day, but I think this is one of the biggest potential future product lines. So far all agents assume there's a human who is taking responsibility & prompting it.
One clear way forward is to have an agent that takes full responsibility for something - e.g. accounting or email marketing, same way like an employee would.
The reason why you hire people is not just they are good at what they do, but they'll take responsibility and make sure things happen. That's why you are ok hiring people even with zero experience in that function - the important part is that someone is thinking about it and it's not all on you.
What happens now with agents is kind of a disaster - since you can do so much more, you end up going into more and more areas. But guess what, the agents aren't responsible for anything, so everything new that you are doing is 100% your responsibility. So yes agents are helping, that amount that you need to worry about grows enormously.
It is also not realistic to expect everyone to learn to use agents effectively, Excel has been around for 30+ years and what's the % of people who have any clue how to use SUMIFS or something simple like that. AI is even harder to grasp, since model capabilities & products are changing every month.
If AI adoption relies on people learning how to use agents en masse, we are screwed, it is just not going to happen.
So instead what we need is agents that just work. Imagine you are a starup founder, you need an accountant. Instead of spending 1/5th of your headcount on hiring an accountant, you pay $30k a year and get an AI accountant that would just take care of things - it would monitor your work, proactively tell you what's wrong and have weekly meetings with you to discuss issues, like you would with a human.
I have no idea how well Specialist dots will work, but it is the first mainstream agent that you don't need to actually prompt. It is possible that it is a year or two too early, but I really like this pattern, this has to be part of the future in some way.
来源:petergostev · x.com