跳到正文
原文
X:AI at Meta (@AIatMeta)· @AIatMeta·· 2 天前AI 评分62

Meta 发布数学家与 Muse Spark 协作完成的六篇论文

Following gold-medal-level performance from our AI models across five competitions in mathematics, physics, and chemistry, we asked a harder question: can AI contribute when a problem is genuinely open and without an existing solution path? Over the past several months, mathematicians worked with Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 in Thinking Mode through the regular http://meta.ai chat interface, with no custom research scaffold, to find solutions to such problems. Our goal wasn't to mass-produce papers, but empower researchers. Every collaboration followed the same principles: mathematicians guided the research, a second group of mathematicians then reviewed the work, each paper marks which passages were drafted primarily by humans or AI, and each credits the prior research it builds on. Where other teams independently announced solutions to the same problems, we acknowledge their work as well. Today, we're sharing six papers from that collaboration. 🧵👇

AI 导读

Meta 分享六篇论文,来自数学家与 Muse Spark 1.1、Muse Spark 1.2 在 Thinking Mode 下通过常规 meta.ai 聊天界面协作求解开放数学问题,未使用定制研究框架。合作遵循数学家主导研究、第二组数学家评审、论文标注人机撰写段落并致谢所依据的先前研究等原则,对同一问题其他团队的独立解法也予以承认。

来源:X:AI at Meta (@AIatMeta) · x.lingyaoai.com